Ryzen vs Hackintosh The Best Bang For The Buck

Ryzen vs Hackintosh The Best Bang For The Buck
Ryzen vs Hackintosh The Best Bang For The Buck

With the release of HMD risin eight core CPI use, we put together the best bang for the buck.

One of the most asked questions was if our rise and build can be turned into a Hakon Tosh. And the answer is no. The main reason is Apple’s never use a named processor, so it’s not officially supported by Mac OS.

Yes, there are a few people have gotten them to work, but it’s unreliable and very difficult to do.

So many of you know that our last Macintosh build was about the same price as this rise and build. So we’re gonna go ahead and compare the best bang for the buck hack and tausche versus the best bang for the buck.

Windows Editing P.c Now Arisan Build was an overclocked in our hack and Tausche is so since that’s not fair. We spent some time tweaking it and got a clock from three point four all the way up to four gigahertz, which resulted in a 12 percent boost in Sydney bench scores.

Premier only received a five percent boost since its poor optimization only uses 50 to 60 percent of the C.P.U, compared to 75 percent with our Hakon dush build overclocked at 4.5 gigahertz.

Before we get into the benchmarks, I wanted to give a big shout out to all the patrons who support us and make article like this possible as a thank you to them, we created an almost one and a half hour detailed step by step build guide for this B.S., starting from the parts in boxes all the way to Windows and driver installation.

That video is available on our patrie on page. So if you enjoy our channel and want to support feature article, consider supporting us and getting all the bonuses of being a patron.

We’ll leave a link in the description along with the full parts list for our build starting off.

We’re going to take a look at Cinna Bench, which is gonna show us the full rendering potential of each c.p.u. Our rise and build comes out seventy seven percent faster than our Hokkien Tausche, but it’ll be up to the editing programs to make use of this power.

We’ll start off with premier pro on both systems, rendering a five minute ten ADP clip with two Lutts and film Green Applied.

The rise and build is about 32 percent faster. Running the same tests in Fourcade shows a twenty two percent improvement. Moving onto the toughest task, which is for four key clips in Afwerki project, each with two Lutsen film gain applied and to close being reversed.

The rise in shows a thirty eight percent improvement. Now most editors don’t go through the hassle of setting up a hack and Tausche to use premiere.

They do it to use final cut, which is a much more efficient program.

So next, we’ll take a look at premiere on Ryazan versus final cut on our Hakon Tosh. Now, before I show you the numbers, I have to mention quick sync.

The reason why Apple computers render video so fast with final cut is the use of Intel’s Quixey chip that separates the rendering from encoding. This makes exporting really fast, which is nice, but it doesn’t improve your timeline editing experience.

The numbers I’ll be quoting are without quick sync because unlike a real Mac using quick sync on a hack and Tosh makes it less reliable.

So in a business environment, we don’t use it, but I will listed below so you guys can check out those numbers as well.

In our five minute tended to be test, Ryazan is about seventy four percent faster than our Hakon Tosh without quick sink in Fourcade, there’s less difference, but still a solid thirty seven percent advantage. Moving onto the toughest four by four K test are hacking. Tosh takes the lead here being forty five percent faster once again.

That was without quick so if you missed the numbers you can wash that part again.

But like I mentioned, we don’t use Quix ink on our Hakon Tosh as far as timeline’s moon. This both systems can play back full resolution Fourcade with a few effects if you stabilize footage.

This is where Final Cut Kills premiere with a twenty second Fourcade clip taking only 14 seconds to analyze compared to six minutes.

This isn’t because of rising but premier pros inefficiencies where it only uses about 10 percent of the processor and none of the graphics card compared to final cut, which maxes out both the C.P.U and g.P you resulting in very fast speeds.

So in conclusion, I’m really impressed with risin four thousand dollars. You’re getting a system with eight cores running at four gigahertz and this is really helping premier pro to be as fast. We’re faster in some tests compared to a hack and tausche where they usually were behind it. Both systems we’re using for course.

This is great for video editors since a majority of them use premier pro.

And if Adobe finally steps up and starts to optimize their system to use more than 50 to 60 percent of this processor, it’s gonna be even better if you haven’t seen our full rise in video. Definitely.

Check that out. We’ll have a card up above and a link in the article description, along with a full parts list to the system and a link to our patron page.

Weaken, support us for a few bucks a month and get access to the step by step build guide along with other bonuses. We definitely appreciate your support and that’s what makes article like this possible. Thank you.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here